What does it mean for a woman to be weak at the front? Weak at the front
Damn, I've been running into the same rake over and over again!!
I'm starting a serious relationship with a girl, we're already talking about marriage...
and suddenly I find out that she’s cheating on me... she met a guy at a disco and slept with him, I know that for sure... Truth told him that she had a boyfriend (that is, me) and that he shouldn’t count on more (truth told him that so, like, I’m afraid that I’ll fall in love and I have a boyfriend, etc.). At the same time he calls me (and we are in different cities for now) and tells me how much he loves me, misses me, etc... Well, does that really happen??? Now I don’t know how I can trust her at all, maybe she came up with all this to get to Moscow..
This is common to many people.
But in general, the behavior is very strange, I would still postpone the wedding, relationships should be built on trust and fidelity, otherwise it is a very strange relationship. If she is afraid of falling in love, then the question arises, does she love you?
I advise you to just sit down and think, putting aside your emotions. What kind of relationships do you accept for yourself, what do you expect from relationships, what does cheating mean to you, etc. And then you will understand whether you need it or not. Have you been betrayed or is it a lie, if it’s a lie, then why.
In any case, the situation is not very pretty, to put it mildly. My IMHO.
barboris
do you think that you can have a serious relationship after such events?
barboris
- This is a symptom that says that you don’t understand something about people. All her words about love are nonsense. she doesn’t know what it is to love, at this time there is no need for other men. There can be dozens of likes. but they love one. If they are looking for young ladies in discos and nightclubs, they often find exactly this.
Lock her up in this club so she can have some fun...
Well, I didn’t meet her at a disco... For now I won’t do anything, I’ll wait to see how things go..
There is such a category of girls - naive and gullible, they somehow suddenly manage to do it, and then they surprise themselves...
barboris
You choose yourself... to justify it, or to look at reality.
Every man deserves the woman he has
barboris
You know, I once thought that they foolishly cheated on me once - but she won’t do that again. She really didn't do that anymore. But this thought haunts me to this day. And I loved it. Madly in love. And now I love her. And now we haven’t been together for a long time, and when I suddenly remember, everything turns upside down in my soul. Can not be so. It is forbidden. You can try to fight this, but it is impossible to win, forget, forgive. Even now, when I walk from one to another, I remember her, and cannot fall asleep for a long time. I know this is paranoia, but what can you do? Therefore, I advise you to end all relationships.
saf84
- after some time (now it will seem unrealistic) you will be able to see everything with different eyes. Youth is given for knowledge, and it does not happen without mistakes.
It’s important how she remembers your relationship and what’s going on in her soul. It makes sense to meet someday and talk without haste and fuss about what happened, but it is worth doing this when there is no relationship with the other. Such a meeting can be useful for both of you, so that you don’t regret it for many years. that the necessary step was not taken.
Good luck!!
hamster2
I really hope you're right.
But I just tried to talk and find out how it happened. There is only one answer... “I don’t know... I was just stupid”
This is such a comprehensive answer.
You told me this and I immediately felt so sad... I don’t even know what to advise... But time heals...
barboris, if she really loved you, she would never have done this. From this we can conclude that she is a flighty girl, find yourself another windless and faithful one and everything will be fine with you =)
Alexandr_rina
I can say from my own experience that if a girl loves, she will never cheat. I had a story when I cheated (I didn’t sleep, I just kissed, but I think that’s also cheating) on my boyfriend with the man I loved madly. I told everything later, we broke up, although he forgave me, I just couldn’t. After all, the worst betrayal is when they cheat not with their body, but with their soul...
Alexandr_rina
In principle, you are right. Then the question simply haunts me: “If she loves, then how did she allow this?”
There are two answers, either she doesn’t love her or she was raped
This is fucking simple in one word. Don't wear rose-colored glasses, in particular, in relation to this girl. You are not married yet, she takes advantage of the fact that you are not around and sleeps with the first person she meets. What will happen if you live side by side, she will get tired of it very quickly if she chooses an open relationship.
Soltera
Well, not always. There is also an expression - “weak at the front”. It’s just that often a girl, when she says “no,” cannot explain why, and because of her weak character and under the stress of perseverance, she gives consent without understanding why. But the girls discussed here are unlikely to fit this criterion.
Frey
“Weak at the front” - that’s just bullshit. And what you are talking about is weak in character and, excuse me, in mind.
saf84
- the process of personality formation often drags on for many years. Many people have had one sad disease since childhood - “if only they wouldn’t find out,” but anything is possible and it’s no big deal.
This is not about pathologies. It’s just that the “weak woman” loves to have sex, she knows exactly what she wants. And if a girl “doesn’t know why she did it” “can’t refuse because it’s hard for her to say no,” then this is no longer promiscuity, but, IMHO, nonsense.
I suddenly realized one thing... Several years ago I dated a girl. And she had a boyfriend in another city... in general, the situation is completely the same as now, only then I was on the other side. And now I find myself with this...
Alexandr_rina
barboris
Cycle... nothing can be done, it happens
barboris
But I often say. "Don't do anything you wouldn't want to do to you"
saf84
Yeah. Right. But he is not always able to do this
saf84
Not easy to implement, but true.
Okay, let's put the question differently then.
Situation:
===
A guy (P) is dating a girl (D). Everything is fine with them, they are already thinking about the wedding. Then the guy goes on a business trip far, far away for, say, six months. Well, of course they call back, text messages, ICQ, etc. every day. And suddenly D accidentally meets a guy (P1). They begin to communicate, and suddenly D realizes that she is very interested in P1, he is so cool.. Besides, P is far away.. In general, she starts dating P1, while continuing to write SMS and call P every day. But now she’s getting closer day X - when P returns from a business trip.
Let's put an ellipsis here...
===
So, how can you evaluate the behavior of D, P, P1?
| QUOTE |
| So, how can you evaluate the behavior of D, P, P1? |
so... there are many options... the first one - both are gay and the girl is crazy... (p1) .. the second - spongebob came and took the girl away... the guys are crazy... another option.. gangbang. ..one more - a Swedish family, one more - everyone became emo and started crying and then they stabbed themselves to death... and the last one... 3 corpses
barboris In this situation, why did D get acquainted with P1 in the first place? Boredom? But then what's the point of P being a hypocrite if she likes P1? Then you need to break off relations with P in order to be honest with yourself. And so, he leads both Ps by the nose. P swears his love to one, and sleeps with the other P1. And you're telling me that this isn't bullshit? As they say, love is tested by time and separation. So, the strength of all the feelings of your D for P, with whom she met, is clear, she is not so faithful to him, her love is not so strong, apparently there was only sympathy, nothing more. After all, when a person loves, there is no way he can like someone else, no matter what the situation. my IMHO.
Soltera
Apparently yes. This suggests that she is not yet ready for a serious relationship.
Apparently you want not to lose there and be in time there.
This is worse than damnation. Blasting is having an active and unattached sex life. And this situation is BETRAYAL
!
Not really. The most difficult test for love is everyday life. those. living together. And distance is also a test, but usually, even with passion, it only inflames feelings. And there wasn’t even passion here...
Actually, this is not a work or even an attempt to create one. Just thinking out loud and wanting to hear the thoughts of those who have certainly already encountered this topic.
It was a good company, balanced in its different dimensions and the conversations were appropriate and the speech concerned women. How much time passed, maybe an hour or two, and suddenly the name of our good friend and not just an acquaintance, but the wife of our comrade and, what is important, a very not ordinary comrade was heard! The most interesting thing is that it was said in front of him. Sergei, an ordinary guy, Andrei’s driver, suddenly suddenly said to himself: Yes, she’s good, of course, but she’s a bitch and weak in the front, that’s not even the right word! The silence was filled with inquisitive glances, everyone looked at Sergei, I was the first to break down: In what sense does this mean? Andrei paused stoically. It was clear that Sergei himself was stunned by his words. About two minutes later, Yurok saved the situation; he told some funny and moderately obscene joke and turned everyone on to the topic of hunting. During a smoke break, I asked Sergei without any notice to others: Where does such knowledge come from and why such confessions? He began to deny it, saying that nothing had happened with her and could not have happened because you don’t give a fuck where you live! And when he took her shopping, she behaved very strangely: she wore a miniskirt that she didn’t want, sat in the back seat in the middle and spread her legs, while her eyes became foggy and oily, and one day he caught her in a forest park with a young security guard with whom she had sex in the car. Now I didn’t know what to say because I also had something to remember, but I was puzzled by the fact that I was not the only one in this story. Then Yurok came up to me and said quietly in his own way: To be honest, I fucked her too, a first-class bitch, and it turned out to be simple. I caught her with Kostya and decided to talk to her while Andrei was on a business trip, well, I got wound up and pushed her so hard that she lay down, and then I got carried away and when I needed to, I just harshly reminded her of what could become public and I got everything I wanted. There's a hell of a lot of information, but I didn't support my comrades' recognition of my story; it was moderately romantic and very pleasant...
And in fact, all this is completely ordinary life and there is no obscenity. I don't quite understand this expression. So talking about a woman you essentially don’t know? Weak in the front, how do you like it? Suppose that Seryozha cuts the truth, being principled and, like, very smart!
And apparently this is kind of bad. So it’s good when you’re strong in the front or not weak in the front)! And a certain question is in the air about us dear ones, I can’t even imagine that I don’t have any reaction to a good woman and there is no need to discuss the concept of good because this is a separate issue that is definitely worth thinking about.
So what, am I weak at the front? Or strong :)? How's Seryozha? It's funny... Herds of pretty, good and even just wonderful girls, girls, women like him are hanging out this way and that, and he is like a flint in post number 1! The question, Comrade Seryozha, arises by itself :)! Weak in the front? Or like: We don’t need the sun - the party shines for us! We don't need bread - give us work! As the late Ahmad said: We must take care of sperm, it contains all our strength and health and longevity :)! Yes, Ahmed, God rest his soul, you need to take care of the sperm, but you just need to be friends with your head! To be continued
The shortcoming of Catherine II has been savored and savored by many historians, writers and filmmakers for several centuries - formally it turns out that the empress was, as people say, “weak at the front.” She had lovers, or, as they were respectfully called then, favorites, in their twenties, and the last one, Platon Zubov, became Catherine’s lover when the empress was already 67, and he was 22. What can I say? Alla Pugacheva still has room to grow creatively.
I am not a specialist in sexopathology, I can only give simple, peasant characteristics in this matter, but I am confused by some details incomprehensible to me in the sexual life of Catherine II. Firstly, a number of favorites were not just a number of male dogs for her, but she really loved them, especially in her relative youth. And she lived with the same Grigory Orlov for 12 years, had a son with him and, continuing to love him, forgave Grigory’s numerous infidelities. Potemkin is a completely different story, but, let’s say, her love for Lansky, who was 29 years younger than Catherine. When Lanskoy died, the empress was so worried that she herself was close to death. Having locked herself in her rooms, she stopped going out and meeting anyone, and fell into such a deep depression that her comrades panicked and called Potemkin from the south, who for several months patiently showed miracles of ingenuity in order to stir up the empress, return her interest in life and thus force him to return to government affairs. Only two months after Lansky’s death, Catherine first left her rooms for mass in church, and only six months later, Potemkin’s handsome adjutant Ermolov, brought in by Potemkin for treatment, managed to draw Catherine II’s attention to himself as a man.
With this matter, it’s still clear - if ancient old men fall in love with young girls, then why shouldn’t grannies fall in love with young boys? Maybe it could be so.
However, what I don’t understand at all is that the favorites also sincerely loved Catherine as a mistress, and not at all at her young age. Yes, there were favorites who strived for money and participated in intrigues, but, for example, the same Lanskoy did not ask for anything from Catherine and was not involved in any politics - he simply loved Catherine, suffering from her betrayals. Or take Zavadovsky, Potemkin’s adjutant, whom Potemkin left behind to Catherine due to the need to be present in Novorossiya himself. Catherine was 47 years old, Zavodovsky was 10 years younger, but when they separated, Zavadovsky, according to contemporaries, was extremely worried about this separation and did not marry for another 10 years.
The behavior of the actual secret husbands of Catherine II is also amazing. When Catherine, after 12 years of marriage with Grigory Orlov and his many infidelities, finally lost interest in this husband, it was Orlov who found her a worthy replacement for himself - Grigory Potemkin. Further more. Potemkin, in turn, began to supply lovers to this secret wife of his - all of Catherine’s favorites after Potemkin were from his retinue (except for the last one - Platon Zubov).
How to understand this?
Be that as it may, such an abundance of favorites - some of whom simply coveted money, some meddled in state affairs - this, of course, was a disadvantage of the empress, since the state treasury and public offices were not intended for such purposes.
However, as I once wrote about this, Catherine was a Woman with a capital W (just as Suvorov was a Warrior with a capital W). Nowadays such Women are very rare, but before there were more of them.
How should this be understood - who is Woman with a capital W? This is the one around whom a man feels like a Man. And for a man, this feeling is the highest satisfaction, in connection with which a Woman can inspire a Man to do any, even the most difficult and dangerous things, and he will be happy that the Woman entrusted these things to him, and that he does these things because that the Woman wanted them. After all, Catherine’s favorites (except for the two Grigori – Olov and Potemkin) are, after all, lovers and nothing more. But other men stood beside Catherine and were happy to serve her, who were not her lovers and did not pretend to be, say, all the other Orlov brothers, Bezborodko, Rumyantsev, Betskoy and many others. And these are only the Men near Catherine at the throne. How many people like Suvorov were there who occasionally met with Catherine?
I am particularly impressed by the Russian fleet of those times. After all, from the second half of the 19th century to the present day, it is impossible to look at the “exploits” of the Russian fleet (even off its shores) without tears. And then! Alexey Orlov is smashing the Turks all the way in the Mediterranean Sea, Admiral Chichagov is smashing the Swedes in the Baltic, Admiral Ushakov is smashing the Turks in the Black Sea. Where did this come from if the sailors and officers for the most part were still not sea wolves, but infantry, who, of necessity, were put on ships and had never seen the sea before? And Admiral Senyavin, who first crushed the French on the shores of the Mediterranean Sea, and then defeated the Turkish fleet in the Aegean Sea, was also from the Catherine era.
It just so happened that it was Catherine who had to do great things, but no matter how strong she was as a Woman, she was still nothing more than a woman. And this made her weak, and therefore she needed a man with whom she could hide. This is not about her life, as such - she always had enough personal defenders. This woman needed to hide behind a man when solving difficult state issues - she needed someone who would take responsibility for finding ways to solve them and would find them. Grigory Orlov, her long-term true love, was a reliable defender of her life, but he was not a statesman - he was not interested in state affairs. But Grigory Potemkin turned out to be the one who was needed - he was able to lead Russia and relieve Catherine of the headache of the severity of government decisions.
Source:
Now evaluate what befell this woman as the head of state.
For centuries, the average person has been taught that the Turks are a very weak enemy. Yes, this is correct propaganda, it is needed so as not to be afraid of this enemy, but it is propaganda. In fact, this is not so. And at that time, the Ottoman Empire was a huge and powerful state, occupying almost all the shores of the Mediterranean Sea, the Arabian Peninsula, and territories in the east up to the Caspian Sea. In the west, the borders of the Ottoman Empire passed near Vienna. Already at the beginning of the 18th century, the population of the Ottoman Empire was estimated at 30 million people, while in Russia, according to the 1719 census, it was only 15.7 million. When Catherine ascended the throne, the population of Russia (within the borders of 1720 according to the 1763 census) was only 21.4 million people.
Before this, the Ottoman Empire coped with Russia without problems - in 1711, the Russian army under the leadership of Peter I was defeated by the Turks on the Prut River, the Russian-Turkish war, which Russia waged in alliance with Austria in 1735-1739, Turkey won, depriving Austria Serbia and Wallachia, and Russia had to raze the Azov fortress.
And during the reign of Catherine, a very favorable situation developed in the world - all the then large countries of Europe had unresolved military problems. England, on the one hand, was stuck in a war with the newly formed United States, on the other hand, taking advantage of this opportunity, France and Spain stormed Gibraltar, trying to take it away from England and acquire it for their own.
Türkiye was left without allies, but it was possible to attract Austria to an alliance with Russia. Autonomous Crimea rebelled against its khan - the people of Crimea were tired of strife and turmoil and agreed to become part of Russia; Georgia, having suffered from the power of the Turks, once again asked to be part of the empire. Well, how could we miss such an opportunity!
However, how could a woman herself decide to aggravate relations with the formidable Ottoman Empire, to aggravate tensions that inevitably lead to war?
But this woman already had a man who was no less a fanatic of Great Russia than the empress herself. Catherine II already had Potemkin, and she could rely on him in this matter - behind his broad back (behind his mind and will) and the woman who happened to become the empress could be calm.
From Samoilov, a participant in the secret wedding of Catherine and Potemkin, information was preserved - when Samoilov, who was reading “The Apostle” at the wedding, came to the words: “Let the wife fear her husband,” Samoilov did not dare to say them and looked at the empress. She nodded her head decisively: “Yes, he will be afraid!” She was tired of being the lonely ruler of a vast empire; she wanted someone she could “fear.”
And this touch of Catherine’s wedding is hardly a legend.
Catherine corresponded with the German publicist Baron Friedrich Grimm for many years in a row. In 1785, Catherine wrote to Grimm: “I am deeply convinced that I have many true friends. The most powerful, the most active, the most insightful is undoubtedly Field Marshal Prince Potemkin. ...and to be fair to him, he is smarter than me, and everything he did was deeply thought out.”
No less interesting is the assessment of Catherine’s attitude towards Potemkin by his enemy - Catherine’s last lover Platon Zubov, who thought only about personal wealth and complained that in his place as a favorite it was only because of Potemkin that he did not become twice as rich: “Although I defeated him half, but I couldn’t completely get rid of it from my path. And it was necessary to eliminate him, because the empress herself always went towards his desires and was simply afraid of him, as if he were a demanding husband. She only loved me and often pointed to Potemkin so that I could follow his example.” When Potemkin died, Catherine sadly informed Grimm: “Now the whole burden of rule lies on me.”
This does not mean that Catherine, under Potemkin, skimped on her duties as empress and did not govern herself, abandoning Russia to Potemkin. No, she was the empress, and since this Woman was also just a woman, Potemkin did not always have it easy with her.
Lopatin reports that the memoirs of Fyodor Sekretarev, the son of Potemkin’s valet, made in his adult years, have been preserved. Ten-year-old Fedya was an unwitting witness to Potemkin’s argument with Catherine: “The prince hit the table with his hand and slammed the door so hard, leaving the chamber, that the glass shook. The Empress burst into tears. Noticing the frightened Fedya, she smiled at him through her tears and said: “Go and see how he is?” And Fedya goes to Potemkin’s half, who is sitting at the table in gloomy thought. The boy manages to attract his attention. “Did she send you?” asks Potemkin. Fedya’s simple-minded childish denial, Fedya’s words that “she is crying, lamenting that she should go and console her,” at first evoke a stern retort: “Let him cry!” But soon the prince softens and goes to make peace.”
It is also interesting what caused this particular quarrel.
Catherine, herself a German, after Prussia began to harm Russia in a difficult war with Turkey, hated the Prussians and went with them to aggravate relations, which could end in war. Such behavior of a German woman on the Russian throne is a common thing for Russia, in the history of which there are many cases when foreigners or foreigners became more Russian than the Russians themselves. So, in the above case, Potemkin demanded that Catherine write a conciliatory letter to the King of Prussia and thereby prevent Russia from being provoked into war with the Prussians. Catherine, as you can see, refused, but Potemkin insisted like this - to the point of tears.
And on October 18, 1789, Catherine II wearily wrote to Potemkin: “Try, my friend, to create a useful peace with the Turks, then many troubles will disappear, and let us be respectful: after your current campaign we can expect this. ...I am sending Alexander Vasilyevich Suvorov an order, a star, an epaulette and a very rich diamond sword. Having showered him with diamonds, I think there will be a kazist. And it’s true that there are a lot of parasites. I have long been of this opinion. I regret that you were tortured: take care of your health, you know that I and the State need it... Christ is with you. Be healthy and happy... We caress the Prussians, what it’s like in the heart to endure their rudeness and curse-filled words and actions, only God knows...”
And in another letter: “My whole life has been devoted to maintaining the shine of Russia and therefore it is not surprising that the insults and insults inflicted on her, I cannot tolerate in silence and hide them...”
Her whole life was dedicated to the splendor of Russia...
And can this be disputed?
Yes, Catherine II had the above-mentioned shortcomings. But she accepted Russia with a population of 21.4 million, and before the death of Catherine II in 1796, an audit showed that the population, even within the old borders of 1720, had grown to 29.2 million people, and in general, 37.5 already lived in Catherine’s entire empire million people. That is, over the 43 years since 1719, the population grew by 27%, and during the 34 years of Catherine’s reign, the population of Russia grew by 75% - almost doubled, and Russia became the largest state in Europe in all respects. And Russia became like this not only because of the accession of other peoples to the empire. Despite the continuous wars, the number of Orthodox Christians in the empire grew from 20.0 million people in 1762 to 30.9 million in 1795. By the end of the empress’s reign, even within the old borders of 1720, the number of Great Russians, Little Russians and Belarusians almost doubled:
- Great Russians - from 11.1 million to 20.1 million;
- Little Russians - from 2.0 to 4.7 million, and taking into account those liberated on annexed lands - up to 8.2 million;
- Belarusians – from 0.38 to 0.66 million.
Here you have a German, here you have a weak front.
, -dka, m. 1. The front part of the carriage, sleigh. Sit on item 2. usually plural. Two-wheeled cart for shells and trailers...
? cm. …
front"to, frontend", frontend", frontside"in, frontend", frontend"m, frontside"to, frontend", frontside"m, frontend"mi, frontend", ...
m. 1) coll. Same as: in front. 2) a) outdated. The front of a carriage, cart, etc. b) Front wheels with...
front ok...
front...
front ok...
the front part of the carriage, sleigh Sit on the front end of the two-wheeled cart for shells and trailers for an artillery gun Remove the gun from ...
front, plural in meaning units, m. 1. The front part of the carriage, cart. The front of the cart. Sit on the front. || Front wheels with...
front m. 1) coll. Same as: in front. 2) a) outdated. The front of a carriage, cart, etc. b) Front wheels...
m. 1. open the same as before 2. obsolete. The front of a carriage, cart, etc. Ott. Front wheels with axle...
- about who...
Data: 2009-07-02 Time: 07:31:25 * A pampered dog becomes a puppy. * Whether ripe grain will grow - who knows? The withered grain will grow...
Data: 2007-12-26 Time: 14:35:20 * There is more nobility in endurance than in strength. (John Ruskin) * There is power in movement...
Data: 2008-12-22 Time: 10:03:03 * No matter how tricky you are with the mirror, the reflection always looks into your eyes. * There is enough in the world...
Data: 2009-05-17 Time: 04:13:29 *— Who is she? - Queen. Her head was cut off. - At all? - At all. *—Girl, are you dancing? ...
Data: 2009-06-30 Time: 22:39:55 = B = * Whether a person is poor or rich, he will never become virtuous and happy, ...
Data: 2008-06-04 Time: 10:16:25 * The important thing is not how long, but whether you lived correctly. *If you look closely, you will find...
Data: 2009-06-02 Time: 13:35:04 Painting Wikipedia - * Or maybe beautiful cave painting was once forced to go underground? ...
- a hypothetical form of social order in which family and political power belongs to women. The theory of matriarchy arose in line with natural science evolutionism, ...
The first political party in Japan - Aikoku Koto (Society of Patriots) - was created in 1874. Immediately after its appearance...
Khrom, Khromets, Khromusha and very affectionately Khromushka called a person who falls on one leg, which is weak, sore or shorter than the other. From...
Modern funeral and memorial rites, taking into account past traditions Funeral and memorial rites and associated customs occupy a special place in the rituals of life ...
(Tue 1:44). There is no insect more widespread than the bee, which can be found in every country of the world. Her abilities...
Open Orthodox encyclopedia "TREE". Stavropol and Vladikavkaz diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church. Diocesan administration: Russia, 355017, Stavropol, ...
Open Orthodox encyclopedia "TREE". This article contains incomplete markup. The Reformation, one of the largest events in world history, whose name is...
Open Orthodox encyclopedia "TREE". Bible. Old Testament. Being. Chapter 29 Chapters: 1 2 3 4 5 6 …
- together with an alternative authoritarian moral ideal, it constitutes a dual opposition, the poles of which are in a state of ambivalence. Both of them are the result...
- is inherent in any nation in one form or another. However, the unusual nature of Russian history raises the question of its S....
- a special human response to the challenge of history, to the complication of the social world. It is aimed at obtaining subject knowledge, knowledge of things, processes...
1) King of Sicily from the dynasty of Aragonese kings, who reigned from 1342 to 1377. Son of Pedro II and Isabella of Tyrol. J.: with...
From the Habsburg family. King of Hungary by 1830-1848 Emperor of Austria and King of the Czech Republic in 1835-1848. Son of Emperor Franz and...
Frankly speaking, the scientific study of the history of Russian literature begins only in the 19th century, when a number of new and remarkable discoveries appeared in ...
Ivan Sergeevich is the largest Russian realist writer. Genus. in the village Spassky-Lutovinovo (formerly Oryol province). The writer’s mother, V.P. Lutovinova, is autocratic...
a long cart without a body, the front and back of which are connected by longitudinal...
Soviet Socialist Republic, Ukrainian SSR (Ukrainian Radyanska Socialistichna Respublika), Ukraine (Ukraine). I. General information The Ukrainian SSR was formed on December 25, 1917. With the creation ...
tabbogan, tobogan (a word of Algonquian origin), a useless sled, common among the Indians of Canada. Consist of boards 3-4 m long and 30-40 wide...
socialism Great October Socialist Revolution of 1917. Formation of the Soviet Socialist State The February bourgeois-democratic revolution served as the prologue to the October Revolution. Only socialist revolution...
